Hate is a very dangerous emotion. The most
dangerous, actually. The ironic thing about hate is
that it does more harm to the hater than it does to
the hated. Sadly, the Nigerian state is presided over
by a man who hates for a living. It grieves me
beyond reason to see that this senseless hate has
found it’s way into the sacred temple of justice that
is the Judiciary.
Yesterday, the 25th day of April, 2017, in the case
of the leader of The Indigenous People Of Biafra,
Maazi Nnamdi Kanu versus the Nigerian state, the
presiding judge, one Binta Nyako, granted bail to
the IPOB leader with one hand and took the
freedom attached to the bail with the other hand.


According to the judge, Nnamdi Kanu is being
granted bail based solely on health ground but in a
move that left no one in doubt that the Judge never
really meant to grant bail to the Aba-born Prince but
was simply bent on distracting Nigerians from the
long absence of the gravely ill president Buhari, she
gave some of the bail conditions to include that (1)
the Biafra strong man must produce a senator, an
influential Igbo leader plus a Jewish leader as
surety who must all deposit 100million naira each
and must have landed property in Abuja (2) he must
not be seen in company of more than 10 people.
(3) he must not grant any interviews (4)All his
passports must be submitted to the court, among
others. And his bail will be revoked if he violates
any of the aforementioned conditions.

Create An Amazing Websites Blog For Free√

Now, permit me to analyse these conditions:
(1)The Jewish Leader condition:
In her moronic bid to mock Kanu’s claim to the
Jewish faith, madam Binta Nyako ended up
mocking the judiciary and subjecting her position
as a Judge to ridicule.

If a Nigerian citizen who lay claim to the Jewish
ancestry/religion must produce a Jewish leader to
surety him on bail in Nigeria, will a Nigerian who
pray towards Mecca also be required to produce an
Islamic cleric from Saudi Arabia to stand surety for
him, too?? Will my father, Ogbu Nwa-chima, an
adherent of the traditional religion, be asked to
bring an Amadioha priest as surety if he has a case
in Nigerian court?
(2)Kanu Must Not Be Seen In Company Of More
Than 10 People:
This particular condition exposes this fulani woman
Judge as a hopeless bigot playing a script that is
far removed from what the judiciary stands for.

Nnamdi Kanu is the most influential Igbo man alive.
He has millions of followers both here in Nigeria
and outside this country. There are hundreds of
thousands of other Nigerians who really don’t care
about Biafra but have come to love him because
they believe he is a victim of tyranny. Even Kanu’s
immediate family is made up of more than 10
people seeing as he is of royal blood.
Except you were born dumb or a product of Quota
system, how do you grant bail to such a man and
still insist he must not be seen in company of more
than 10 people??

The hospital he will visit for his health problem, will
he hire soldiers to keep every other persons away?
Even outside the court premises, how do you stop
his number-less followers –many of whom have
categorically told you to either give them freedom
from oppression or kill them– from mobbing him??

In a clime where confidence in the judiciary holds
meaning, madam Binta Nyako would have been
relieved of her duty immediately. No Judge whose
brain was not producing anti-bodies against itself
would give this kind of senseless condition for bail.

(3)Kanu Must Not Grant Interviews
A wise man once said and I quote: “When you cut
off a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar.
You are only proving to the people that you are
afraid of what that man might say”
I will leave this here.

If Madam Binta Nyako was not a hate merchant like
her principal, Buhari, how would she grant bail to a
man on health ground and still attach all these
devilish conditions? Without Nnamdi Kanu’s
passport, how would he be able to get medical
attention outside Nigeria? Does Binta Nyako really
want Kanu to get medical treatment or she plan on
seeing him die of ill-health in prison?

If Muhammadu Buhari was not a dark hearted man,
why would he be releasing boko haram terrorists
from prison with cash compensation and protecting
his murderous fulani kinsmen with a special army
taskforce while he is using his stooge, madam
Binta, to ensure that Kanu who has never killed a fly
remains in jail?

If the so called human right activists in Nigeria
weren’t as useless as the Buhari presidency, they
would have since seen that Nnamdi Kanu’s case is
now a clear case of the abuse of the fundamental
human right of a citizen by a 16th century brained
highly vindictive No-Where-To-Be-Found President.

Any man or woman, Igbo or not who brokered this
kind of evil deal for the IPOB leader is more
devilish than the devil.

Courtesy: FWP